Home > Internal Compiler > Internal Compiler Error Java.lang.illegalargumentexception

Internal Compiler Error Java.lang.illegalargumentexception

Owner PID: unknown Our PID: 65744 Owner Operation: unknown Our operation: Initialize cache Lock file: /Users/leonardo/.gradle/caches/2.10/scripts/dependencies_7dh1rpm6pyjkhy37vu4750p7f/cp_dsl/cache.properties.lock Open File If they are not related I can create another issue... — You are ERROR in /home/rmuir/workspace/trunk-termsdict/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/cloud/SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverUtilsTest.java (at line 0) [ecj-lint] package org.apache.solr.cloud; [ecj-lint] ^ [ecj-lint] Internal compiler error: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: info cannot be null at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.codegen.StackMapFrame.addStackItem(StackMapFrame.java:81) [ecj-lint] ---------- [ecj-lint] info cannot be null BUILD FAILED I'm proposing to backport this to 4.3.1, because: - the damage is real and the only workaround I see is to disable annotation based null analysis (quite a big hammer) - How to give player the ability to toggle visibility of the wall? weblink

High School Trigonometric Integration Is foreign stock considered more risky than local stock and why? please look at the patch Hide Permalink Uwe Schindler added a comment - 15/Aug/14 12:38 Ah you are only talking about Constants.java Sorry, I was discussing about common-build.xml which is the Accept & Close CodeGuru Home VC++ / MFC / C++ .NET / C# Visual Basic VB Forums Developer.com Register Help Remember Me? We therefore detect 3 versions: "1.7", "1.8", "1.9". https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=465900

I changed some more conditions, like the ecj one. Show Michael McCandless added a comment - 14/Aug/14 14:16 I'm seeing this too... We could fix this with a groovy taskdef, providing a version comparator (to be investigated). It's a trivial change and needed for RC1 because > this is a regression.

Forum New Posts FAQ Calendar Forum Actions Mark Forums Read Quick Links Today's Posts View Site Leaders What's New? And why? Hide Permalink Robert Muir added a comment - 14/Aug/14 14:11 give me a moment to run precommit with java8 as well: I will test it. I believe that once the initialization range is fixed, the code generation should work as expected.

Stephan, please either attach a patch or a link to the commit you plan to put into 4.3.1. I am now working on makint the common-build-detector assign "unknown" to everything which is not in our expected list of JVMs. At some point I think we want to support java 8 in ant tasks like this. additional hints Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc.

Home | New | Browse | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Terms of Use | Copyright Agent If somebody downloads the version from today and runs it with Java 10, we are not prepared for that, ecj would suddenly run on that version, although not wanted. I'm using Ant 1.9.4 to build the project and Eclipse Mars.1 Release . (4.5.1) The compiler version is : javac 1.7.0_79 Was anyone encountered this error before? All rights reserved.

Here's the stack trace for the exception from the .log file. https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=24738 Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Hide Permalink Robert Muir added a comment - 15/Aug/14 12:24 There is no problem here Uwe. People say that you should use Double.parseDouble() , but this is broken after Java 10!

Sasi, please take a look at this. have a peek at these guys Interaction between a predictor and its quadratic form? Try JIRA - bug tracking software for your team. This also prevents annoyances for developers if they accidentally run precommit with java8...

It is currently in use by another Gradle instance. Comment 9 Dani Megert 2013-07-15 07:21:43 EDT (In reply to comment #8) > I have looked at the the fix and +1 for the fix. > > Dani, I reckon this It seems to solve the issue for me. check over here Bug241044 - Internal compiler error java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: info cannot be null Summary: Internal compiler error java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: info cannot be null Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 238923 Product: JDT Classification: Eclipse Component: Core

DownloadGetting StartedMembersProjects Community MarketplaceEventsPlanet EclipseNewsletterVideosParticipate Report a BugForumsMailing ListsWikiIRCHow to ContributeWorking Groups AutomotiveInternet of ThingsLocationTechLong-Term SupportPolarSysScienceOpenMDM More CommunityMarketplaceEventsPlanet EclipseNewsletterVideosParticipateReport a BugForumsMailing ListsWikiIRCHow to ContributeWorking GroupsAutomotiveInternet of ThingsLocationTechLong-Term SupportPolarSysScienceOpenMDM Toggle navigation Bugzilla Owner JakeWharton commented Aug 18, 2016 Might be a suitable workaround for now? Show Mark Miller added a comment - 14/Aug/14 14:24 Thanks Robert!

If you agree to our use of cookies, please close this message and continue to use this site.

Thanks I agree. "Proof-by-analogy": The fix is nicely in line with the guard for the other side-effect into 'scope' (beginning of the same enclosing then-block): if (this.original == this) recordFunctionalType(scope); +1 Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#673>, or mute the thread . The error was shown in the 'problems' tab in the 'errors' section. please look at the patch Show Robert Muir added a comment - 15/Aug/14 12:24 There is no problem here Uwe.

It's a trivial change and needed for RC1 because this is a regression. I changed some more conditions, like the ecj one. I will work on that later! this content Comment 15 Stephan Herrmann 2013-08-22 17:18:41 EDT Adjusting whiteboard entry so this gets a review in Luna.

This has nothing to do with your code, it looks like the eclipse compiler has fallen over. With this patch. Cleaning the project and/or refreshing the project do not make any difference. Results 1 to 3 of 3 Thread: Listeners and Variable errors Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode

Hudson gave a +1 here (https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/47016/). If I try to take out some of the dependencies to get > it down to something I can share here the error goes away. > > I have tried different Tests running with the patch. It is currently in use by another Gradle instance.

If somebody downloads the version from today and runs it with Java 10, we are not prepared for that, ecj would suddenly run on that version, although not wanted. The cleaned up version is put to temporary property The public property build.java.runtime is then defined as strict enum (because we have no version comparison magic in ant, so we can Comment 5 Stephan Herrmann 2013-07-07 09:20:09 EDT Update: I could even remove most of the fields incl. 'runable'. In the near term, to use java.specification.version, we would need a good ANT-based version comparator, too.

Comment 3 Sasikanth Bharadwaj 2015-05-07 01:47:21 EDT Created attachment 253262 [details] patch Comment 4 Sasikanth Bharadwaj 2015-05-07 01:49:54 EDT Stephan, please review. Description Emond Papegaaij 2015-04-30 05:30:27 EDT Created attachment 252943 [details] small showcase for the internal compiler error When trying to compile the attached project (only 2 classes) with the latest 4.5 asked 11 months ago viewed 141 times active 11 months ago Blog Stack Overflow Podcast #91 - Can You Stump Nick Craver? E.g., we no longer need to suppress optional errors, the program in this shape has none.

I'm not entirely convinced by your design - selectedFileHolder will be changed asynchronously so why is it a local variable anyway - what are you trying to achieve? Later we can see if its possible to remove this check. We had this in the past, e.g. At some point I think we want to support java 8 in ant tasks like this.

Show Uwe Schindler added a comment - 14/Aug/14 15:27 - edited Sounds fine. Hide Permalink Michael McCandless added a comment - 14/Aug/14 14:16 I'm seeing this too... Dani, I reckon this is a good candidate for 4.3.1.