Home > Internal Compiler > Internal Compiler Error In Memory Address At Explow.c

Internal Compiler Error In Memory Address At Explow.c

the error message usually includes a link to the website where you can file them (e.g. Please use these changes with your own risk. If you don't set TMPDIR from your AUTOEXEC.BAT or from the DOS prompt, the DJGPP startup code sets it to the tmp subdirectory of the main DJGPP installation directory. Lu 2012-11-07 23:02:58 UTC Created attachment 28632 [details] A complete testcase I applied i386 change at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28591 to compile it: [hjl@gnu-tools-1 tmp]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc/release/usr/gcc-4.8.0/bin/gcc -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -maddress-mode=long -mx32 -O2 -fPIC rtld.c -std=gnu99 weblink

Did you try v3.21 Beta (no internal compiler errors with the examples above)? It has been trouble in the past where depending on how many bytes were moved memory space attributes were ignored. #15 cawilkie Administrator Total Posts : 1944 Reward points : 0 What are the legal consequences for a tourist who runs out of gas on the Autobahn? Lu PR target/58690 * gcc.target/i386/pr58690.c: New test Comments Uros Bizjak Oct. 12, 2013, 7:21 a.m. check it out

Law 2011-02-01 03:48:43 UTC --- st4 definitely isn't a valid memory address... Status: offline RE: C30 3.21 compiler errors 2009/12/05 06:21:55 (permalink) 0 I'd just send the code "as is". We recently changed our old build machine and this has introduced some oddities into the system. But in terms of performances, I can't say anything yet since I'm still writing intrinsics and I have no library to test . –xelp Mar 5 at 4:27 also,

up vote 1 down vote almost every time gcc displays a message that starts with internal compiler error, you should file a bug. asked 7 months ago viewed 65 times active 7 months ago Blog Stack Overflow Podcast #91 - Can You Stump Nick Craver? Description Diego Novillo 2011-02-01 03:09:18 UTC Compiling the test case at the end with -O2 causes: $ ./cc1plus -O2 -quiet a.cc a.cc: In function 'void E(uint64*, uint64*, const void*, int64)': a.cc:18:15: Lu 2012-10-31 11:09:29 UTC (In reply to comment #5) > > It is caused by revision 188118: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-06/msg00028.html > > Are you really sure?

When SRCPTR is NULL, output the @@ -23032,8 +23047,8 @@ ix86_expand_movmem (rtx dst, rtx src, rtx count_exp, rtx align_exp, if (!count) count_exp = copy_to_mode_reg (GET_MODE (count_exp), count_exp); - destreg = copy_addr_to_reg One particular case of such programs is when you initialize very large arrays. The failure just shows that the controversial patch [1] for PR 49721 was wrong. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515672 Why v3.21 Beta when v3.21 is officially available for download? #6 nice Super Member Total Posts : 1013 Reward points : 0 Joined: 2004/09/18 11:42:25Location: Germany Status: offline RE: C30 3.21

Get first N elements of parameter pack What is the meaning of this sentence and why did the Giant rip open his belly? For 4.7 I'd say we want to split this reinitialization up, into reinitializations that matter for tree optimizations (ideally those could be saved into (and restored from) some save area pointed Let me try to fix this correctly. Tested on x32.

Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55142-1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55142-2.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog Comment 37 Eric Botcazou 2012-11-13 19:36:47 UTC Hopefully. They screwed up the compiler internal memory move code generation which is used in memcpy and structure assignments. When in doubt, always enlarge the compiler stack size. Why does Mal change his mind?

What's the alternative? http://wiiplay.net/internal-compiler/internal-compiler-error-net.html Best regards, Bernd #13 aschen0866 Super Member Total Posts : 4017 Reward points : 0 Joined: 2006/01/08 22:18:32Location: San Diego Status: offline RE: C30 3.21 compiler errors 2009/12/07 17:41:57 (permalink) 0 init_set_costs can be saved into target_cfgloop structure), and initializations that only matter from expand_gimple_cfg entry till free_after_compilation (there we could remember the last TARGET_OPTION_NODE (or global) and if current TARGET_OPTION_NODE (or Lu 2012-10-31 02:21:16 UTC This diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index 2284703..8569418 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -12902,6 +12902,8 @@ legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, rtx reg) else { base = legitimize_pic_address (XEXP

Regards Calum #16 stumichaels Super Member Total Posts : 499 Reward points : 0 Joined: 2007/03/13 21:03:10Location: Commack, NY Status: offline RE: C30 3.21 compiler errors 2009/12/07 22:32:01 (permalink) 0 We They were just bypassing the real problems. Law changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. check over here Try our newsletter Sign up for our newsletter and get our top new questions delivered to your inbox (see an example).

Bug47564 - [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error in memory_address_addr_space, at explow.c:504 Summary: [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error in memory_address_addr_space, at exp... Once you find the offending code, you could rewrite it and/or submit a bug report to the GCC maintainers. A tell-tale sign of this problem is that the CS and DS limit value printed in the crash message is very close to the end of the 4GB address space, like

Why don't we have helicopter airlines?

We are working some issues with our internal regression tests not catching bugs until late in the game, and we have had differences depending upon which machine we build the release up vote -1 down vote favorite I have 3 versions of gcc installed on my linux 64 bit machine gcc 4.9.2 gcc 5.3.0 gcc 6 [ a build from an svn Your code examples, both 1) & 2), compile without any error on my PC, which has the latest v3.21 installed. #8 flubydust Super Member Total Posts : 1230 Reward points : Lu Details | Diff View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

gnu ! We recently changed our old build machine and this has introduced some oddities into the system. Did you compile without optimization? http://wiiplay.net/internal-compiler/internal-compiler-error-gcc.html This patch adds ix86_copy_addr_to_reg > to first copy DImode address into a DImode register and then to generate > SImode SUBREG in this case.